Search This Blog

Friday, December 30, 2016

Russian Hacking: Obama is attempting to suicide the nation before Jan 20th

Democrats (and their media servants) blame Russia for “hacking” and tipping the election to Trump.

What did or could Russia “hack”? The only “hacks” could have been in large centers where machines are used … if those machines were online during the voting process … which they are not until transmitting results.

Maybe the work “hack” is/was inaccurate … no surprise there considering the source(s) of that accusation.

So far no actual proof has been offered … just speculations based on anonymous sources. That sure wouldn't hold up in a court room and certainly wouldn't be grounds for a warrant request.

Whether Russians did or did not “hack” anything … not that it's possible to any extent: The objections we are hearing are about what was being exposed are factual happenings voters SHOULD know to make an informed decision

The objections are not about the content ... just about the method ... same technical crap that let’s criminals go free in courtrooms every day.

The difference is that revelations about the Democrats, Hillary, the DNC etc are actual information for voters to see past the speeches and into the hearts/minds of those making them. That is very relevant information … especially when choosing a President who will affect your life significantly for at least four years.

Elections are just ‘job interviews’ … in front of the millions of people (not persons) who are the collective ‘employer’. And let's be clear that people DO NOT vote for those 'job applicants' behind podiums to be their 'masters' … nor do they vote for 'social engineers'. They vote for someone who will represent them as they want to be represented … nothing less.

Last time you applied for a job you had to provide your work history and credible references, and those were subject to investigation and confirmation before hiring. (Scrutiny)

Can anyone tell me how hiring a politician differs from that basic fact everyone else must live by?

So if, in that job interview process, information comes to light, regardless of the source, that exposes facts relevant to the legitimacy, capability or intent of the 'job applicant', and that information is accurate, regardless of source; Why should that not be a viable basis upon which the electorate (employers) make a decision as to who to choose for that job?

The 'losers' of the November 8th job interview are trying to blame Russia … Comey … right wingers … anyone other than themselves for the truths that were exposed about their means, tactics, methods and collusions … they got caught, red-handed and are pissed because they

So pissed that the outgoing Representative of the Democrat ideology is initiating actions that could promote international hostilities … possibly to claim there is an “emergency” that requires him to stay in office, thereby preventing a Trump transition on January 20th.

Stay tuned and stay aware … anything is possible before January 20th. That's when the power struggle ends and the healing can begin.

No comments:

Post a Comment