Search This Blog
Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Sunday, January 8, 2017
I'd be hacking too even though I'm not Russian!
Why would I hack (if I could!): Because political 'games' affect all of us and we know for sure that we DO NOT get full & factual information from the main stream media or from government SPOX.
Why would a foreign entity "hack"?: Same reason ... they would want to know the who, what, why and when, as much as they could, to prepare for the consequences of who will be guiding policy of a nation that may affect them. That's been going on for decades ... nothing new there.
The argument is screwed ... sorry ... meant "skewed": The point of contention here, when you listen to the arguments, is NOT that Russia was able to access servers ... it's about WHAT they revealed, if in fact Russia had anything to do with it at all!
There has been NO denial of the truth in the email exposures ...just angst about the METHOD ... and the method is being attacked, not the truth. Same "legal technicality" bullshit that allows criminals to go free!
WikiLeaks has put out all the data, not the Russians: Without a shred of proof MSM taking heads espouse that WikiLeaks released data fed to them by Russian parties. WikiLeaks has denied this, and with WikiLeaks error-free track record over a decade I'd say their track record deserves far more credibility than talking heads, government "officials", anonymous sources or a president who have been caught out lying countless times.
Just like you and me: The Russians, or any other entity, want to know what they/we are up against or going to be helped by where political choices are concerned. That's called "being responsible" ... for yourself and your family, or for a nation you lead.
Hillary Clinton and the DNC lost the election: NOT because anyone tipped it by subversive means. They lost it because they do not have the trust of the electorate and with Obama's 'track record' mainstream Americans were scared shitless to trust another Democrat administration.
The "alternate media" is now the enemy, and being attacked in the so-called mainstream media: No surprise there ... liars hate being caught out and exposed. And a cooked, booked and hooked propaganda industry isn't about to give up their prestige and those awesome corporate adverting dollars just for the truth. (good reason to end corporate "person-hood" soon as possible.)
Wednesday, January 4, 2017
Laughable Hypocrisy — Mexico is upset about losing Ford plant & jobs — Blames Trump
Caution:
This
commentary will require an IQ of 100 at minimum. If you fall below
that threshold you are advised to close your browser window now and
return to Facebook or cartoons to maintain your comfort zone.
Moving
on now with the 100+ crowd ...
Here is a quote from the AP article today (link below)
"Trump leaves Mexico without 3,600 jobs," read
the headline on El Universal. "Ford's braking jolts the peso,"
said Reforma, referring to the Mexican currency's nearly 1 percent
slump following the news.
I
really can't remember when Mexico ever objected to Americans losing
jobs when plants moved there!
Sort
of hypocritical, huh! ... Blaming
Trump
because Mexico has an externally-dependent and dysfunctional economy!
Ohhh ... that sure stacks up on common sense & logic!
And!!
If
3,600 jobs can affect the peso by 1% ... what the hell kind of
economy does Mexico have? Not one that isn't dependent
on
outside help ... and Mexico, on top of it, is one of the richest
nations on earth with all their natural resources!
Maybe
... just
a thought here
... if Mexico ORIGINATED
anything worth manufacturing (other than great tequila and a prolific
drug trade, mind you) they would not have to rely on foreign
businesses to create jobs for their people ... and
the peso wouldn't slump 1% because ONE factory changes it's plans!
I know ... it's a
"weird concept" ... but I'm sticking with it!
I
am also laughing my shiny ass off because the hypocrisy is so evident
... but also worried as hell too because so many Americans (Members
of A.N.U.S.
— Americans
Not
Understanding Sovereignty)
actually support this shit!
Of
course, it must be said that those pathetic people in A.N.U.S.
take their 'marching orders' from SPHinCTER
(Soros'
Political
Hegemony
in
Contradiction
To
Everything
Republican)
and blindly blather on while they protest, burn cars, loot local
businesses and harm people physically to express their frustrations.
(Therefore
the A.N.U.S.
retentive people are SPHinCTER
dependent which creates P.I.L.E.S.
... Problematic
Idiocy
Leading
to Economic
Suffering)
... just
so you know.
Apparently the notion of
"America First" is offensive to those who insist "Mexico
First", and those A.N.U.S. members might want to move to Mexico
to lend their expertise to the Mexican government about getting their
own economy functioning, on-track and viable.
Reference:
AP —
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/L/LT_MEXICO_FORD?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2017-01-04-14-45-38
Friday, December 30, 2016
Russian Hacking: Obama is attempting to suicide the nation before Jan 20th
Democrats (and their media servants) blame Russia for “hacking” and tipping the election to Trump.
What did or could Russia “hack”? The only “hacks” could have been in large centers where machines are used … if those machines were online during the voting process … which they are not until transmitting results.
Maybe the work “hack” is/was inaccurate … no surprise there considering the source(s) of that accusation.
So far no actual proof has been offered … just speculations based on anonymous sources. That sure wouldn't hold up in a court room and certainly wouldn't be grounds for a warrant request.
Whether Russians did or did not “hack” anything … not that it's possible to any extent: The objections we are hearing are about what was being exposed are factual happenings voters SHOULD know to make an informed decision
The objections are not about the content ... just about the method ... same technical crap that let’s criminals go free in courtrooms every day.
The difference is that revelations about the Democrats, Hillary, the DNC etc are actual information for voters to see past the speeches and into the hearts/minds of those making them. That is very relevant information … especially when choosing a President who will affect your life significantly for at least four years.
Elections are just ‘job interviews’ … in front of the millions of people (not persons) who are the collective ‘employer’. And let's be clear that people DO NOT vote for those 'job applicants' behind podiums to be their 'masters' … nor do they vote for 'social engineers'. They vote for someone who will represent them as they want to be represented … nothing less.
Last time you applied for a job you had to provide your work history and credible references, and those were subject to investigation and confirmation before hiring. (Scrutiny)
Can anyone tell me how hiring a politician differs from that basic fact everyone else must live by?
So if, in that job interview process, information comes to light, regardless of the source, that exposes facts relevant to the legitimacy, capability or intent of the 'job applicant', and that information is accurate, regardless of source; Why should that not be a viable basis upon which the electorate (employers) make a decision as to who to choose for that job?
The 'losers' of the November 8th job interview are trying to blame Russia … Comey … right wingers … anyone other than themselves for the truths that were exposed about their means, tactics, methods and collusions … they got caught, red-handed and are pissed because they
So pissed that the outgoing Representative of the Democrat ideology is initiating actions that could promote international hostilities … possibly to claim there is an “emergency” that requires him to stay in office, thereby preventing a Trump transition on January 20th.
Stay tuned and stay aware … anything is possible before January 20th. That's when the power struggle ends and the healing can begin.
What did or could Russia “hack”? The only “hacks” could have been in large centers where machines are used … if those machines were online during the voting process … which they are not until transmitting results.
Maybe the work “hack” is/was inaccurate … no surprise there considering the source(s) of that accusation.
So far no actual proof has been offered … just speculations based on anonymous sources. That sure wouldn't hold up in a court room and certainly wouldn't be grounds for a warrant request.
Whether Russians did or did not “hack” anything … not that it's possible to any extent: The objections we are hearing are about what was being exposed are factual happenings voters SHOULD know to make an informed decision
The objections are not about the content ... just about the method ... same technical crap that let’s criminals go free in courtrooms every day.
The difference is that revelations about the Democrats, Hillary, the DNC etc are actual information for voters to see past the speeches and into the hearts/minds of those making them. That is very relevant information … especially when choosing a President who will affect your life significantly for at least four years.
Elections are just ‘job interviews’ … in front of the millions of people (not persons) who are the collective ‘employer’. And let's be clear that people DO NOT vote for those 'job applicants' behind podiums to be their 'masters' … nor do they vote for 'social engineers'. They vote for someone who will represent them as they want to be represented … nothing less.
Last time you applied for a job you had to provide your work history and credible references, and those were subject to investigation and confirmation before hiring. (Scrutiny)
Can anyone tell me how hiring a politician differs from that basic fact everyone else must live by?
So if, in that job interview process, information comes to light, regardless of the source, that exposes facts relevant to the legitimacy, capability or intent of the 'job applicant', and that information is accurate, regardless of source; Why should that not be a viable basis upon which the electorate (employers) make a decision as to who to choose for that job?
The 'losers' of the November 8th job interview are trying to blame Russia … Comey … right wingers … anyone other than themselves for the truths that were exposed about their means, tactics, methods and collusions … they got caught, red-handed and are pissed because they
So pissed that the outgoing Representative of the Democrat ideology is initiating actions that could promote international hostilities … possibly to claim there is an “emergency” that requires him to stay in office, thereby preventing a Trump transition on January 20th.
Stay tuned and stay aware … anything is possible before January 20th. That's when the power struggle ends and the healing can begin.
Monday, December 26, 2016
Obama claims 3rd Presidential run victory ... but only against Hillary
Obama Says He Would Have Defeated Trump for a Third Term ... in an interview with David Axelrod, who we all know is an impartial and objective journalist!
Sorry, Barry ... your hubris does not match with facts.
Against Hillary you would have won hands down ... she has no worthy track record and an over-sized ego. You, on the other hand have no worthy track record and an over-sized ego. So you would have won just because you're there already ... not because you're competent or great in any way.
Hillary lost on the basis of her own dis-merits combined with your 'track record' of making America weaker in every important aspect.
Hope & Change? Who's hope and what change were you actually referring to?
Could you have won against Donald Trump?
Not likely ... outside of highly dense populated areas (i.e. New York and California where the bulk of your welfare-dependent supporters dwell) Donald Trump won the majority of counties across America, which represent a broad spectrum of Americans, their lives and their means of sustenance ... they voted en masse for him which is far more representative than inner-city enclaves of government-dependent voters ... not to mention that those inner city areas are also the areas most vulnerable to vote fraud via machines, illegal immigrants (who you support so much) and tampering.
Could you have won against Trump? Yes you say?? Ok ... now you're the "dreamer". Let's look at a few FACTS, even though you find facts unpleasant, annoying and uncomfortable.
Trump talks to people, unscripted and from the heart ... you talk at people via a teleprompter, reading words written by someone else.
Trump is his own, accomplished, man with undeniable credentials in the press and as an expert witness before congress over decades ... you are a nobody with no substantial accomplishments and you had to seal your records to make sure nobody could vet your claims to 'greatness' & merits.
Trump, following the foregoing, has done more in the month and a half since the election to straighten out America's many tense situations than you were able to do in eight years with your famous pen and phone. No surprise there since Trump's track record is based on being in the office WORKING ... as opposed your plan of being on a golf course and excusing yourself for NOT working.
Trump's reputation (something you do not possess outside of a phony Peace Prize) has caused international business and political leaders to come to the table to renegotiate on Trump's terms for the betterment of America ... as opposed to you, giving the store away from a golf course with your pen and phone, as you put it.
Trump, pre-inauguration, has brought jobs and companies back to America ... apparently he does have a "magic wand" as you mentioned ... or, perhaps, he supports America in a manner you apparently don't or cannot fathom.
Trump is, pre-inauguration, the President of America in the eyes of the world ... because you have been so inept, transparently shallow (yup ... there's that transparency you mentioned) and completely dishonest that the world is laughing at you.
Here is your legacy Barry Barack Husein Marshall Obama Soetero Harrison Davis (or whatever the hell your actual name is) ... there will be more people saying "good riddance" than will be saying "good bye" come the 20th of January, 2017.
Sorry, Barry ... your hubris does not match with facts.
Against Hillary you would have won hands down ... she has no worthy track record and an over-sized ego. You, on the other hand have no worthy track record and an over-sized ego. So you would have won just because you're there already ... not because you're competent or great in any way.
Hillary lost on the basis of her own dis-merits combined with your 'track record' of making America weaker in every important aspect.
Hope & Change? Who's hope and what change were you actually referring to?
Could you have won against Donald Trump?
Not likely ... outside of highly dense populated areas (i.e. New York and California where the bulk of your welfare-dependent supporters dwell) Donald Trump won the majority of counties across America, which represent a broad spectrum of Americans, their lives and their means of sustenance ... they voted en masse for him which is far more representative than inner-city enclaves of government-dependent voters ... not to mention that those inner city areas are also the areas most vulnerable to vote fraud via machines, illegal immigrants (who you support so much) and tampering.
Could you have won against Trump? Yes you say?? Ok ... now you're the "dreamer". Let's look at a few FACTS, even though you find facts unpleasant, annoying and uncomfortable.
Trump talks to people, unscripted and from the heart ... you talk at people via a teleprompter, reading words written by someone else.
Trump is his own, accomplished, man with undeniable credentials in the press and as an expert witness before congress over decades ... you are a nobody with no substantial accomplishments and you had to seal your records to make sure nobody could vet your claims to 'greatness' & merits.
Trump, following the foregoing, has done more in the month and a half since the election to straighten out America's many tense situations than you were able to do in eight years with your famous pen and phone. No surprise there since Trump's track record is based on being in the office WORKING ... as opposed your plan of being on a golf course and excusing yourself for NOT working.
Trump's reputation (something you do not possess outside of a phony Peace Prize) has caused international business and political leaders to come to the table to renegotiate on Trump's terms for the betterment of America ... as opposed to you, giving the store away from a golf course with your pen and phone, as you put it.
Trump, pre-inauguration, has brought jobs and companies back to America ... apparently he does have a "magic wand" as you mentioned ... or, perhaps, he supports America in a manner you apparently don't or cannot fathom.
Trump is, pre-inauguration, the President of America in the eyes of the world ... because you have been so inept, transparently shallow (yup ... there's that transparency you mentioned) and completely dishonest that the world is laughing at you.
Here is your legacy Barry Barack Husein Marshall Obama Soetero Harrison Davis (or whatever the hell your actual name is) ... there will be more people saying "good riddance" than will be saying "good bye" come the 20th of January, 2017.
Monday, December 19, 2016
Hillary's Ego Defeats Her Again ... eventually she might learn somthing?
OK ... hate to say it ... actually I love to say it!
I told you so!!
Yesterday's post predicted this
Hillary LOST electoral votes!
Hillary's cheap efforts and 3rd party antics have again proven that lies and deceit (however "clever" you might feel you are at the time) blow up in your face... "blow-back" as Ron Paul famously said. Gotta love Karma seeing this happen!
Hillary really seems to work in a sort of 'lawyer mode' ... if you can "win" with (parsed) words, and procedural tricks ... truth, facts, honesty, morality, decency, respect (all the good aspects of humanity) don't count.
Sorry (not) to bring this to your attention, Hillary and associated minions, ... the united states of America is not your 'court room' where you can play procedural and word games. It is, in fact, a collection of real people, with real lives ... people who care about a future that benefits their children and stands in honor as the most compassionate and generous nation on earth.
You, Hillary, thought you could STEAL this election with your tricky methods ... like you stole the nomination from Bernie Sanders. You misjudged ... your loyal miscreants misjudged too ... or, they were petrified to tell you the truth because truth isn't something germane to your character ... apparently you violently oppose it!
You lost the election on November 8th ... now you lost it even worse because you're the worst candidate in the history of politics in the united states of America ... but your ego didn't coincide with the condemnations you made about Trump when he refused to pre-commit acceptance of the results. Why would he with your history of deceit?
So you have humiliated yourself further ... even though you want to blame every and anyone other than yourself for your self-inflicted loss.
People don't trust you ... why the hell should they? People don't like you ... why the hell would they?
Go away with your family and minions ... stay away and don't inflict yourself and ideas on good people any further. Good bye Hillary ... or, better, good riddance for everyone's sake here and abroad.
Wednesday, December 14, 2016
Electors — Mind your ass and reputation on the 19th
Significant history is being made with the 2016 Presidential election. Those associated with this election will certainly have a place in the history books.
What side of history will those people be on when the books are written? What will children learn about them in social studies classes in the future? Whatever they learn will be based on the actions of those written about. And they will judge based on the world they are living in ... good or bad.
The Electoral College, this year, is particularly in the spotlight because unproved allegations of Russian interference are being propagated by people with a vested interest in changing the election results.
So far, the suspiciously funded efforts of Jill Stein have yielded only additional Trump votes ... so Hillary now lost by bigger numbers! No wonder she's apparently drinking more than usual!
So I had a funny thought about the allegations of "Russian influence" ... the chance of them having done so is minuscule ... however IF they had the means to do so, to benefit Trump, it introduced a question I've not heard mentioned at all throughout all the media coverage!
IF Russia favored Trump, and had any means to significantly affect election results' Why would they do so?
Clearly Trump is too patriotic for the answer to be Russia having a cooperative 'puppet' as POTUS.
So it must be somethings else!
Perhaps (as radical as this may sound) ... IF Russia were to have made efforts to influence the election; Is it therefore reasonable to think that their reason may have been to deal with a President who wants peace and commerce as a relationship (Trump)?
After all, Hillary Clinton has maintained a distinctive posture of aggression toward Russia ... vilifying them (Putin) for all her problems ... so WHO would Russia rather deal with? Someone advocating peace & commerce ... or someone who wants a fight and blames them for her political failure?
So, if you were Russian: Who would you favor? That's NOT a difficult question if you are sane!!
Technically, Russia could not have affected the election in a "hacking' sense to any significant level, if at all ... no proof has been or could be provided to establish they did ... but the sound bytes continue because (according to some) Hillary's electoral humiliation on Oct 8th simply MUST be someone else's fault!
So with the failure of Jill Stein's conveniently funded recount efforts (more money collected than she got for her Presidential run!) ... now the Electors are in the spotlight ... under documented pressure, harassment and threats of physical harm to become 'faithless' and switch their votes from Trump to Clinton. Does that sound reasonable? Would any witness in a court have credibility when there is credible evidence they were coerced or intimidated?
Seems to me that any significant switch in the Electoral College vote should be suspect, And any Elector switching his or her vote faces the judgement of history ... and of those who voted faithfully and entrusted their vote to that elector.
The Electors ... lets hope they have sense in the face of fear and intimidation and partisan spin.
Thursday, November 24, 2016
Thanksgiving Should Include America's Second Chance — Not Just celebrate a Comfy Delusion of Days Gone By
What is everyone so thankful for this weekend?
Prosperity? — Where?? (outside of Wall Street & DC, of course)
Health? — GMOs, Chemtrails and ObamaCare equal "health"?
Safety? — Russia, N. Korea, ISIS and paid gangs running wild in the streets?
Thankful for those maybe?
Prosperity: Who feels that way right now? At least 90 million under and unemployed Americans don't! Middle America perhaps? ... nope — Inner city folks then? Who?
Health: How much does it cost you? Did you keep your Doctor or plan? Does the FDA look out for you, or for big Pharma & big Agra instead? Do you give your thanks for being sprayed like a bug by unaccountable people?
Safety: The Russians hack elections! ... North Korea could detonate an EMP! ... ISIS is planning events to kill Americans over the holiday! But you're a 'terrorist' and 'hater' and 'racist' if you disagree with leaving the borders wide-open for those and other threats to just walk on in! Yup ... but give thanks anyway because it's 'traditional' to do so!
How many homeless and destitute Veterans are giving thanks this weekend, having honorably served in the name of and for the nation as they sleep under sheets of cardboard on the side of a street with nothing to eat?
Probably most of them ... because they would never have signed up to put themselves in harm's way for a country they didn't love and believe in ... who would?
Compare them to the masked vandals on the streets. After the "protest" they go home, toke up and discuss how successful they think they were bringing down the very county that affords them the opportunity to legally be such unappreciative, destructive and disrespectful morons. The hard-working people whose property they destroyed in the process might have a different opinion!
In fact ... they did!
On November 8th, 2016, 'productive Americans' drew a line in the sand and decisively elected a President who squarely put Americans ahead of corporations, politics and politicians.
Yikes!!! No wonder there are protests! What a weird thing to do! What a strange concept that the lives and well-being of American citizens should take priority over the profits of corporations and the ideas of the politicians who created the problems in the first place! Quick, go out and protest that ... in fact if you check Craigslist you can actually get paid to do so ... and transported to the protest in a nice bus!You can criticize Trump for any number of things from his choice of words to his choice of barber ... but you can't legitimately criticize his passion for the country and making it great again. He wants America to have a second change to be what it was, and more.
Trump ACTUALLY DID what an old and true adage says ... He put HIS money where His mouth is, and did so in a no-nonsense manner that won the popular and electoral vote against an opponent who put other people's money (about 4 to 1) where her mouth was on any given day.
In other words, Trump invested personally in you and the future of the country.
So give thanks this weekend that the majority of America woke up and said "no" to being dragged down any further, and said "yes" to rebuilding a great nation that went astray for a while.
Sunday, November 20, 2016
Hillary Clinton 'Nervous Breakdown' With No Options Left Now But to Run
Click to enlarge meme
The 'Trump Train' is in the station
— Good people are boarding & the Rats are scurrying or kissing ass
If Trump's Attorney General (Jeff Sessions) decides to pursue charges against Hillary Clinton; It's not mysogynism, vengeance or hate on Trump's part ... it's because there is sufficient prima facie evidence (at very least) that Hillary is culpable ... on many fronts. Anyone paying the LEAST attention to facts knows this.
Trump is successful, in part, because he chooses his people well and delegates to them — any successful person will confirm this as the way to do things properly.
If you haven't seen Hillary's post election speech the other day, the first since losing the election, you should.
And when you do, think of this: Hillary's ego is virtually 'legendary' ... as is her vanity. Throughout the debates and the general election, who knows how much money was spent to make her up to look healthy and vibrant (her health being a subject of much credible debate.)
Yet she chose (or allowed herself) — doesn't really mater which as they are the same — to appear on stage, before an audience and on-camera, looking haggard, frail and weak and sounding so as well.
Why would that be? Well, I have a theory ... and since it's mine I respect it a lot!
My theory goes like this:
Hillary Clinton never expected to lose the election. She did expect that she had it all 'locked up' because all the "chips" were in her favor ... machines flipping Trump votes to her, machines shaving votes to her favor, dead citizens voting for her (by proxy of course), busloads of 'undocumented Americans' (illegals) voting for her (multiple times each), the mainstream media colluding with her including feeding her advance debate questions, Beyonce & JayZ (who graciously accepted a $63 million dollar paycheck for showing up to 'support' her & 'root' for her on stage) ... the list goes on (talk about "buying the Presidency.") The famous "Clinton Machine" was hard at work for her.
What Hillary did NOT expect is that the average, wholesome, hard-working, bill-paying American (a term it's doubtful she actually understands) would wake up, stand up and vote for a man who is a total DC outsider ... a man who is of plain language (rather than contrived rhetoric written third party for a teleprompter), who actually has 'family values' and kids who work hard and make their own successes in the world, who (out of passion and commitment, financed his own campaign — no Wall Street, Saudi, Qatari et al money there), and who showed Americans he was passionate about THEIR well-being.
It resonated, because any American actually listening heard the TRUTH being spoken, as uncomfortable as that would have often been!
That kind of plain talk created TRUST ... and regardless of CNN/ABC/MSNBC and all the other 'in-the-bag-for-Hillary' media efforts ... all the tricks, hyperbole and disinformation still resulted in an landslide ENDORSEMENT of Donald J. Trump (popular and electoral) to lead America back to her deserved prosperity.
Obviously, after making such assumptions that she would prevail, Hillary was devastated in her defeat. Not just the loss itself, also the loss of "future options" she simply must have expected to be hers!
For example;
- Being able (as President) to seal - under signature as Obama did - her and Bill's past records
- Pardoning or diverting (as President) investigations into her closest circle of friends who got her back into the White House ... as President!
- Putting Bill out on the speaking stage for highly increased speaking fees and no doubt more.
Answer: PITY ... for two reasons;
- 'Egg on' all those idiots protesting who can't seem to fathom that Hillary lost the election on her own because of her past malfeasance and disingenuous persona,
Those ignorant 'chumps' protesting Trump have no cognizance of what they are supporting or fighting! Just listen to a video or two of real interviews with them ... they are totally disconnected from reality and even from the words and terms they use so 'confidently.' ... they seem to be on a totally different planet!
- To set up the 'stage' that if prosecuted it could be characterized as a "vicious", "anti-woman", "anti-poor-frail-Hillary", "nasty Republican witch hunt."
Well the "witch" (could be spelled with a 'B' as well!) part is certainly true and there are legions of Secret Service and Military personnel who'd corroborate that ... if they could keep their jobs after having done so!But the Clintons still have an 'ass in the hole' ... skip out of the country with all those lovely 'excess' dollars in the Clinton Foundation accounts ... lots.
Meanwhile, back on the political farm ... all those starry-eyed followers who committed a trove of criminal acts to 'help' Hillary achieve her 'deserved' destiny of being the first female (sorry, can't think of her as a woman) President will face the repercussions ... while Hillary drinks herself silly in Qatar (no extradition) and Bill entertains himself with Jeff Epstein on the Lolita Express and on Orgy Island till he keels over.
Oh ya ... there's going to be a lot of 'Hillary-splaining' going on as the rats scurry for whatever legal hole they think they can hide in. With any luck, the reign of the Progressives is over and rumors about George Soros exiting this world with a heart attack are true ... which I doubt because someone like him is completely unlikely to have a heart to begin with ... but one can still hope Karma finally caught up with him!
Wednesday, November 16, 2016
Trump Cabinet & Staff Choices Controversies ... don't fear the hype ... trust the logic
With the election over, and soundly won (popular and college) ... the previous hyperventilating about Donald Trump as a President is useless ... so, hyperventilating about his potential staff, cabinet and other appointments is the new topic of the "let's panic and revolt" crowd ... the propaganda crowd who are humiliated by their past bloviating and 'expert opining' are desperate to somehow justify/excuse themselves so to remain relevant. (Good luck with that at this point!!)
If you know anything at all about Donald Trump's history, you'd know he has a history of defying the odds ... and winning. His Father told him that while they were successful in Brooklyn, Manhattan was somewhere they shouldn't try to go. But Trump did, and against all odds succeeded ... against some of the toughest competitors in the world.
Because he got things done successfully ... on time and under budget! That's how you succeed!
Compare that to how he dispatched all 16 'politically entrenched' competitors in the primaries (pretty good for an non-politician "novice") ... and then 'dispatched' the invincible Hillary Clinton (an entrenched DC denizen with Wall Street and other actors funding her) ... and won the general election with phenomenal success using only his own money ... not donor money.
These are not the 'accomplishments' of a "clown", or a "reality show host" ... they ARE the accomplishments of someone with experience and knowledge in tough situations who knows tactics and who is driven by honest passion. No wonder his book 'The Art of The Deal' has been such a long-standing success. (All the profits from those book sales go to charity, by the way.)
He may bring some people into his circle who are 'establishment' regulars ... but a man of his accomplishments will be doing so with some intent ... to learn from them about the political landscape as it really is. That's not naive or stupid ... that's very smart.
After all, a good tactician abides by the following mantra:
Trump isn't even President yet and look what he's done ... already delivering on his campaign promises! What the hell are those idiots in the streets actually protesting? ... ah, perhaps they are worried that if he brings all those jobs back, they'd have no excuse not to go get one and move out of Mom & Dad's basement!
Obama espoused "hope & change" ... which turned into 'hope for change' ... which resulted in Donald Trump winning the election by a landslide since that "hope" didn't pan out and the "change" was for the worse.
Trump has already done more good for America, in only 7 days as 'President-Elect', than Obama did in almost eight years as President ... not that Obama actually DID anything that has actually benefited Americans in general!
Refute that ... if you can!
***************************************
If you know anything at all about Donald Trump's history, you'd know he has a history of defying the odds ... and winning. His Father told him that while they were successful in Brooklyn, Manhattan was somewhere they shouldn't try to go. But Trump did, and against all odds succeeded ... against some of the toughest competitors in the world.
Because he got things done successfully ... on time and under budget! That's how you succeed!
Compare that to how he dispatched all 16 'politically entrenched' competitors in the primaries (pretty good for an non-politician "novice") ... and then 'dispatched' the invincible Hillary Clinton (an entrenched DC denizen with Wall Street and other actors funding her) ... and won the general election with phenomenal success using only his own money ... not donor money.
These are not the 'accomplishments' of a "clown", or a "reality show host" ... they ARE the accomplishments of someone with experience and knowledge in tough situations who knows tactics and who is driven by honest passion. No wonder his book 'The Art of The Deal' has been such a long-standing success. (All the profits from those book sales go to charity, by the way.)
He may bring some people into his circle who are 'establishment' regulars ... but a man of his accomplishments will be doing so with some intent ... to learn from them about the political landscape as it really is. That's not naive or stupid ... that's very smart.
After all, a good tactician abides by the following mantra:
"Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer." This quote has often been attributed to Sun Tzu and sometimes to Niccolò Machiavelli or Petrarch. It matters not who said it ... it matters that it is a fact-based reality.As President-Elect, just a week after the election and without any 'power as President' the following has already occurred in accordance with his positions as stated throughout both the primaries and the general;
- The US dollar is trading up ... indicating market confidence
- The stock markets have rallied up ... indicating investor confidence in the future
- Tensions with Russia are down ... indicating there is a reduction of defensiveness
- Canada and Mexico have offered to renegotiate NAFTA ... indicating both know about the imbalances Trump spoke of.
- Ford has moved a truck production plant from Mexico to Ohio ... indicating they know Trump will be good to his word on sanctions.
- Apple is talking about moving production to California from China
Trump isn't even President yet and look what he's done ... already delivering on his campaign promises! What the hell are those idiots in the streets actually protesting? ... ah, perhaps they are worried that if he brings all those jobs back, they'd have no excuse not to go get one and move out of Mom & Dad's basement!
Obama espoused "hope & change" ... which turned into 'hope for change' ... which resulted in Donald Trump winning the election by a landslide since that "hope" didn't pan out and the "change" was for the worse.
Trump has already done more good for America, in only 7 days as 'President-Elect', than Obama did in almost eight years as President ... not that Obama actually DID anything that has actually benefited Americans in general!
Refute that ... if you can!
***************************************
Monday, November 14, 2016
"Purple" Corporate Media Post-Election Game-Playing Works With Soros' Color Revolution Plans for the US
Who's side is the US media on and what are their motives?
It's good to see a lot of attention being focused on the subversive activities of George Soros ... and that exposure needs to increase to stop him and the "Purple Revolution" he has planned for America ... like the other 'color revolutions' he has been behind in other places, and the destruction that followed in those places. Let's keep the pressure on this globalist bastard who admits to using and killing people for his own enrichment!
Much thanks to the 7,600 people who, in the last 24 hours, have read and commented on my article about this parasite who lives under the assumed name of SOROS!
There are other culprits at work against the good of America too ... the most visible of whom are many in the corporate media ... but fortunately not all. (Perhaps they are out for revenge for being so wrong, and for looking like pompous fools they are throughout this entire election process.)
Whatever their motivations, it certainly seems they are more interested in something other than the good of the country.
Have you noticed that the corporate media is still trying very hard to make things as difficult as possible for Trump?
Have you noticed that the violence in the streets is being under-reported for what it really is ... paid protesters committing acts of terrorism to influence and subvert the legitimate outcome of the election?
Has the corporate media made any point at all of highlighting how it's Hillary's supporters who are doing the violence that Trump supporters have been (without evidence) accused of in the media?
Has the corporate media made any point at all of highlighting how it's Hillary's supporters who are doing the violence that Trump supporters have been (without evidence) accused of in the media?
Have you noticed that interviews still seek that "gotcha" factor?
For example:
For example:
The Leslie Stahl interview in which Trump is being gracious and measured (Presidential) but his words get twisted to suggest what he did not actually say.
Have you seen, in the corporate media, Trump given any credit at all for the FACT that within days of becoming President-Elect he is already accomplishing goals he set out? Could that not be a talisman of the future?
Does it not seem to you that there is a concerted effort in the corporate media to ignore his virtues and undermine his potential ... versus praise his commitment and energy on America's behalf? Therefore lending tacit approval to those paid demonstrators causing such havoc in communities.
Any half-wit can spend an hour online, gaming, Twittering or posting their latest bowel movement on Facebook for their "friends" (A lot of good that will do a country) or watching the corporate media for a distorted 'snapshot' of reality.
A citizen, however, thinks more widely and deeply ... he and she listens to a variety of opinions, researches, discerns, evaluates, compares and decides their loyalties and positions having done so.
Then he or she votes his or her INFORMED conscience ... which is what happened on November 8th ... resulting in a Trump victory in the popular vote as well as the electoral one. Clean sweep and no ambiguity.
Where is the corporate media supporting this uniquely historical event?
Oh right ... they're still bought off and butt hurt over their own ego-based embarrassment ... retarding healing and economic recovery by still trying to vilify Trump's accomplishments and thereby lending fuel to the stupidity on the streets.
Fortunately rational minds still prevail ... as evidenced by the landslide election of Donald Trump
Mind your Electors on December 19th
*****************************************
Thursday, November 10, 2016
Correction:: The "Dumbocrats"© May Still TRY to Steal The Election — And Commit Political Suicide in the Process
Start by reading this short article about the possibility of more Clinton dirty tricks ... "Standard Clinton Policy" as time has proven!
I've been watching that scenario too ... still after two days you can't reconcile votes? Even hand-counting would go quicker!
Clinton & Podesta et al may TRY to steal those states back … but it would be ‘suicidal’ politically to attempt it because then it would invoke a precedent to examine other places where there was rampant vote rigging going on by the Clinton cartel’s campaign.
Of course, being “Dumbocrats”© anything is possible!
Wouldn’t it be 'Hillaryous' if they tried to pull it off and ended up with less numbers than before … making her well-justified defeat even more humiliating for HRC (talk about deserved poetic justice!)
But, as with all things 'Clinton' ... no fraud is a bad fraud if you can get what you think you deserve!
Clearly, they are really desperate to keep the Clintons out of jail, and desperation leads to stupid moves and decisions! (See my theory on that subject ... Qatar here they come!!)
Also, good chance Hillary doesn't want to give George Sore-ass a refund!
Bring it on! Unlike HRC, Trump actually CAN stand on his own two feet ... legally, financially and otherwise!
That being said:
Hillary, regardless of the reporting in the press, has only "conceded" privately to Trump over the telephone ... a private conversation ... but not publicly ... so would that stand in a court if brought up? You'd expect the typical Clinton word-parsing on that one!
So they may give it a shot (ooops that sounds too pro 2nd amendment) ... OK ... they may give it a TRY ... but a lot of water has gone under the bridge in the last two days that cements Trump's legitimacy as the fair winner on the 8th despite all the tricks played with ballots and registrations. His numbers were no doubt much better had those factors not tainted the results!
And his 'win' has been celebrated around the world already. Trump has also further been proven correct by the fact that Mexico and Canada have immediately stepped up to the plate to re-negotiate NAFTA ... a big plank on his stump.
Look at that, only two days into his status as 'President Elect' and, without another word from him he has brought players to the table willing to 'play ball' on his terms ... terms he laid out when he first stepped into the primary!
Therefore ... what will he accomplish next before even being sworn in? Like peace and trade with Russia? Could anyone say that was a bad thing???
What has Hillary to offer in comparison? ... other than more of the same crap that saw her resoundingly defeated! The same crap that has dragged America into the toilet.
Trump will be the plumber that flushed out corruption and drains the corporate/political cesspool that has destroyed so many lives and undermined America's place in the world.
We indeed live in interesting times!
***************
Wednesday, November 9, 2016
BEFORE YOU RIOT — spend a few minutes reading & comprehending some reality.
So, you plan to head off to join a protest (riot) huh ...
What are you expecting to accomplish? ... other than to underscore the need for self defense in the face of people like you acting out.
Do you think that if you have a violent tantrum, even if George Soros is paying you a few bucks, that your destructive actions are going to change the outcome?
If Hillary Clinton was the superior candidate; Why did she still lose the election even with all the cheating that went on with ballots, voter registrations and more?
How much of someone else's property do you think you must trash just to have your tantrum, and are you fully prepared for the injuries and jail time that await you?
Some of you need a "safe space" after someone uses a word of some sort. Where is the 'safe space' for the people whose homes, business, cars and bodies are under threat from a violent protest that will accomplish nothing of any positive value?
Your candidate vowed to start bombing Iran and was provoking Russia, she also wanted to flood unvetted 'refugees' into US towns and cities. What would happen to your 'safe space' when those provocations result in an incoming missile? What would happen to your 'safe space' when some of those unvetted newcomers start acting like they have been in Europe, or commit acts of terrorism?
Note 1: Did any of you actually LISTEN to Trump's speeches and thoughtfully consider his words and logic? Or did you just swallow talking points fired off to you on Twitter from your candidate's campaign, or from your equally uninformed friends?
Note 2: To those of you sitting in jail right now for committing vote & election fraud; Are you expecting someone from the Democratic Party (or Clinton Foundation) to show up with your bail money and a paid attorney for you? You'll have a good long while to think about that and consider if it was worth it.
Friday, November 4, 2016
Clinton 'Protection Umbrella' Fails Badly — Election Workers Going Down!
Who are these people who 'bravely' face prosecutions and lawsuits by committing illegal acts to 'help' Hillary get elected? [More about the value of "helping Hillary" here — you're actually discrediting her, and yourself.]
Well one thing is for certain ... Hillary Clinton doesn't know their names either, and the chances of her giving a damn? .... well ask Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods how much of a damn Hillary gives ... if you could ... but "what difference, at this point, does it make?" Right?
To Hillary, Trump supporters are a "basket of deplorables" ... it surely follows (ala the Benghazi four named above) that all those criminally inclined people who are 'helping Hillary' by breaking election laws, would easily fit into Hillary's 'basket of expendables' ... people who have served their purpose (in her interests and for her political objectives) but are 'expendable' because she would not allow any tracks leading back to herself by coming to your rescue ... unless you're Debbie Wasserman Shultz ... who is in a different 'friend category' that YOU are!
People 'falling on their sword' for their chosen candidate ... almost sounds 'noble'. Except for the fact that it's not noble to knowingly cheat and lie. It's as if these pathetic followers are under some illusion (spell?) that they are protected from consequences because it's for Hillary ... that Hillary will protect them with the magic 'Clinton Defense Umbrella' ... after all, Hillary (and Bubbu the red-nosed rapist) haven't suffered any consequences for their multiple crimes ... well, not yet.
Have none of these people seen the 'writing on the wall"? What on earth could possibly motivate these people to risk the rest of their lives ... their families and futures too ... for nothing more than a self-centered Presidential hopeful with a clearly vile history?
If you cheated, you've won nothing of any sustainable value, and you have tacitly acknowledged that, in this case, your chosen candidate was too weak and flawed to stand on her own two feet without you to cheat, steal and lie for her ... if she wins, and that is a big IF considering especially the latest revelations.
By cheating, lying and stealing on Hillary's behalf you have willingly admitted that you are not an American, you are not a functional member of society, you are not a worthy member of any community ... you're just a thief ... a charlatan, a fraud and someone worthy only of being shunned by honest, hard-working people. Period.
If you think for a moment that your unethical and lawless actions on behalf of Hillary Clinton will in anyway buy you a 'get out of jail free' card ... forget it ... the Clintons keep all of those cards just for themselves. You're just a useful idiot who is expendable to them, just someone who bought-in to a cult of personality ... and a really bad personality at that!
Labels:
Assange,
ballots,
Clinton,
Comey,
corruption,
Election,
FBI,
fraud,
government,
investigation,
Media,
politics,
Trump,
victims,
White House,
WikiLeaks
Thursday, November 3, 2016
Do things seem confusing and out of control these days?
Do things seem confusing and out of control these days?
Seems like almost everything is 'out-of-whack' to normal people, and we 'normal people' are the majority in any society around the world.
So the obvious question is: If WE are "normal"; Why are we subject to (and victims of) the ABnormal minority with their weird 'policies and plans', and why to they 'govern' us as if we are possessions?
Answer: We, the normal ones, operate in our daily lives in honest, open and ethical ways amongst each other.
Therefore: We, the normal ones, conducting ourselves honestly and ethically, get tricked and bamboozled by the ABnormal minority because we aren't looking out for the tricks that can be played on us!
Hell ya they do!
Seems like almost everything is 'out-of-whack' to normal people, and we 'normal people' are the majority in any society around the world.
So the obvious question is: If WE are "normal"; Why are we subject to (and victims of) the ABnormal minority with their weird 'policies and plans', and why to they 'govern' us as if we are possessions?
Answer: We, the normal ones, operate in our daily lives in honest, open and ethical ways amongst each other.
Therefore: We, the normal ones, conducting ourselves honestly and ethically, get tricked and bamboozled by the ABnormal minority because we aren't looking out for the tricks that can be played on us!
There is a lot of truth buried in media/movies ... the above example is proof of that. A minority gladly controls a majority, through ignorance and/or intimidation ... but constantly lives in fear of the majority (the 'ants') figuring it out and rebelling against such tyranny.
That is where we are today and why things are so incomprehensible to we, the normal ones ... the "ants" ... we've allowed the grasshoppers to control too much due to our 'innocence' and also through our complacency.
We expect, rightfully, that those we elect (hire when they are begging for a job on the stump every few years) to represent our best interests, and that they have a duty to us to do so. While that is morally the case, it isn't so in practice.
"Career politicians" have a great lifestyle ... because, over time, they have legislated that to themselves. Great salaries, perks and pensions ... usually for making or supporting shitty policies and decisions that they, personally, don't have to endure the consequences of ... for instance, check out the exemptions to Obamacare that politicians are able to enjoy that the public is excluded from and instead penalized for.
Donald Trump is exactly right when he calls for term limits on ALL politicians ... if they vote for (support) something ... they too must live with the consequences of that at some point.
Our so-called "representatives" have progressively become our dictators/owners ... we are the ants and they are the grasshoppers who live off us. Time for that to end.
On November 8th, cast your vote for a leader, not another owner.
Labels:
Clinton,
corruption,
Election,
government,
laws,
politics,
Trump,
victims
Wednesday, November 2, 2016
Hatch Act: Comey in the clear & Chaffetz not bound
Let's get past the spin/hype and look at FACTS.
The Hillary troops are doing the typical 'Clinton Thing' ... muddying the water. Something they have decades of experience doing ... successfully unfortunately ... so far! (Hopefully not much longer i.e. November 8th)
To hear Hillary's shills tell it ... Comey (who they loved up until last Friday) "illegally" used the FBI to "influence an election" ... citing the Hatch Act.
Considering the 'news' coverage by in-the-tank-for-Hillary networks, one might give that some credence, not knowing anything different and swallowing the MSM propaganda on this subject.
Let's be clear ...
James Comey did NOT release anything to the PUBLIC ... period.
James Comey, advised Congress of a change to his testimony which he had to do to protect himself from the possibility of future legal problems resulting from not doing so.
Who among us would not have done the same in his shoes? Answer: No one!
The FACT is that the public became aware of Comey's notice to congress when Jason Chaffetz tweeted that he had done so.
Chaffetz is not subject to the Hatch Act.
The Hatch Act:
The Hatch Act of 1939, officially An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law whose main provision prohibits employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president, vice-president, and certain designated high-level officials of that branch, from engaging in some forms of political activity. The law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico. It was most recently amended in 2012. [WikiPedia]
Chaffetz is not in the Executive Branch ... he is in the Congress, and the Chairman of the committee Comey gave testimony to.
Comey's notice to Congress was a private communication to Congress, not to the public.
If Jason Chaffetz made it known to the public via his Tweet, Comey had no control or influence in that action.
I'm not suggesting that Comey is squeaky clean in this process ... just that the Hillary Team's talking points are a distortion designed to confuse you.
It's THIS SORT OF CHICANERY that TRUMP is fighting against ... as should you be too!
***************************************************************
Labels:
Chaffetz,
Clinton,
Comey,
corruption,
FBI,
fraud,
government,
Huma,
investigation,
Media,
politics,
Trump,
WikiLeaks
Tuesday, November 1, 2016
Hillary gagging on Weiner's ... weiner?
Hmmm ... Anthony ("Tony the dick") Weiner — the deviant pervert — has Washington's "special ones" running for cover it seems ... even Hillary's recent 'campaigning buddy', Michelle Obama, has deleted all references to Hillary from her social media ... suddenly since the FBI announcement on Friday last. Whadda great pal! Glowing endorsements one day .. duck & cover (delete) the next day! Wow!
“Loyalty” is an interesting and flexible thing ... depending on the situation.
"Political loyalty" is all about ass-covering and hitching wagons to stars ... selfish loyalty.
Then there is the other kind ... demonstrated by soldiers on the battle field ... exemplified by those who fought to the death for each other in Benghazi. That's a loyalty I think that neither Hillary or Michelle could ever fathom.
Then there is the loyalty of other sorts of wieners ... such as Chris Mathews, who now tacitly endorses Trump rather that wear the responsibility of being a Hillary champ so far! See Mathews Rant
Reminds me of an old expression:
With friends like these; Who needs enemas?
With friends like these; Who needs enemas?
Speaking of enemas:
The current mood in Washington DC suggests that investing in companies that produce adult diapers may be a very good investment!
Only a COMPLETE IDIOT would, at this point in time, suggest that Hillary Rodham Clinton is an innocent victim of rumor and conspiracy theory.
Only a COMPLETE IDIOT would, at this point in time, suggest that Hillary Rodham Clinton isn't at the root of all allegations about her because of her own decisions and actions.
Only a COMPLETE IDIOT would, at this point in time, suggest that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a champion for anyone other than her own self-interest.
Only a COMPLETE IDIOT would, at this point in time, suggest that Hillary Rodham Clinton possesses anything even close to ethics.
Only a COMPLETE IDIOT would, at this point in time, suggest that Hillary Rodham Clinton has any compassion for America and her inhabitants.
Time is short before November 8th ... choose wisely with your ballot or suffer the consequences if you put an X in favor or Hillary, or anyone supporting her.
Only a COMPLETE IDIOT would, at this point in time, suggest that Hillary Rodham Clinton is the path forward for a nation.
Relevant:
Hilly and Huma correlations that are chilling
Hillary Only needs a few days in office before resigning
Then, of course, there is the alternative!
Labels:
Clinton,
corruption,
Election,
FBI,
fraud,
government,
Huma,
investigation,
laws,
Media,
politics,
Trump,
WikiLeaks
Monday, October 31, 2016
Hillary Clinton :: The 'Professional' Victim
There are only two ways to be a "victim".
- At the hands of someone else (circumstantial or deliberate), or
- As a consequence of your own actions.
Hillary is living right in the middle of a cesspool of controversy that grows bigger each day. What are the odds of that being circumstantial or accidental?
According to Hillary, her problems originate from;
According to Hillary, her problems originate from;
- Donald Trump being a misogynist & bully
- Woman haters in general
- Russians who are out to get her to help Trump
- A vast "right wing conspiracy".
That's just so far regarding the 'big picture' influences, and I may have missed a few ... or a lot!!
Next up will likely be;
Next up will likely be;
- Huma jer Weiner set me up!
- Brazille set me up to save her media job!
- Comey hates me and is making stuff up just to make me look bad before the election!
- Civil servants conspired against me!
- ... and anything else that might say "It wasn't me!", "not my fault!"
- I cheated Bernie Sanders out of the Democratic nomination,
- I have cheated with advance information about questions in debates and interviews,
- I lied to Congress and the American people about the whole Benghazi situation,
- I have lied to Congress and the FBI about my email setup,
- I have lied about my 'accomplishments' ... that don't actually exist other than in speeches wherein I'm trying to impress the uninformed,
- I set up a private email server outside of law to hide my personal money-making activities,
- I ignored the security of the country for personal gain,
- I have enough money to move to Qatar, beyond extradition, if I get caught in my lies,
- I have accepted campaign donations from illegal sources & foreign governments,
- I have accepted campaign donations from Wall Street players who I say I am against,
- I tried to steal furniture and silverware from the White House, but got caught (damn it!),
- I had my staff steal furniture and paintings from the State Department when I left,
- I treat other people as lesser beings who should not have the temerity to speak to me or look me in the eyes when I'm present,
- I have a foul and vulgar mouth, and a violent temper outside of public sight, and
- While First "Lady" the helicopter 'Marine One' was renamed in my honor — "Broomstick One",
Hillary is a victim alright ... a victim of her own actions, behaviors and misdeeds. Nothing else.
No pity here. No sympathy vote here. No respect here. No confidence here. A vote for Hillary is a vote for an even bleaker future for everyone.
Labels:
Assange,
Clinton,
corruption,
Election,
FBI,
fraud,
government,
Huma,
investigation,
Media,
politics,
Trump,
victims,
WikiLeaks
Sunday, October 30, 2016
The Weird Hillary-Huma Correlations Exposed
Truth is always stranger than fiction, they say. So in keeping with that I find it odd that Hillly and her pal Huma have some odd characteristics in common that make you say "What are the odds of that?"
- Both are 'married' to sexual predators.
- Both predators (deviants) are former politicians with troubled political pasts
- Both women live rather 'estranged' lives from their 'spouses.'
- Both women maintain 'living arrangements' with their deviant spouses ... whereas most women would not. So it's not out of the question that Hilly & Huma do so for expediency of some sort, putting that ahead of morality or outrage over spousal behaviors.
- Both women were steeped, from young age, in philosophies that are very out-of-sync with traditional 'American values.' Hillary as a protege and admirer of the communist Saul Alinksky (Rules for Radicals), and Huma with her family's long (documented) association with the Muslim Brotherhood.
- What sort of 'snapshot' do these things provide into the mindsets, morals, ethics and motivations of both women?
- Does either woman appear to embody the essence of the 'typical' American family or values?
- Could, therefore, either woman truly understand the true 'heart' of average Americans?
- Hillary and Huma seem 'joined at the hip'. So if Hillary were to become President, you can bet Huma would be playing a significant role in her administration — after all, they do seem to have a very 'special' relationship and closeness.
In other words; They're a 'package deal' and will gather around them only those who support that package and will loyally do it's bidding.
Is that the sort of package you want under your tree this Christmas Season?
Saturday, October 29, 2016
Hillary Tranquilized After Huma's Weiner Exposed Again
Where there is smoke ... there is fire.
Where there is smoke again ... there is fire again.
Where there is smoke and fire several times in the same place,
... you have an arsonist!
How much is enough of this totally corrupt woman and her pals? And to think her followers are willingly breaking laws to help her win the Presidency. If she needs that much 'help', perhaps she doesn't have the right stuff for the job.
Every act of voter or election fraud committed to 'Help Hillary Win' is, in fact, a vote of non-confidence in her by those carrying out such acts.
Why?
Because if someone feels their chosen candidate needs that kind of 'help'; they are tacitly admitting that they believe their candidate does not have the capacity to win on their own merits, capabilities, policies and so on.
Same thing goes for the vandals who think stealing or running over a Trump sign is going to effect the outcome of the election one scintilla. You're just having a tantrum because you're not confident in your candidate.
And you damage your candidate's chances even more by overtly demonstrating that her support base contains a lot of idiots willing to commit criminal offenses to prevail in what is supposed to be a fair and democratic process.
It's time you put the country's best interests ahead of your ideological need to just "win".
Labels:
Clinton,
corruption,
Election,
FBI,
fraud,
government,
Huma,
investigation,
laws,
Media,
politics,
Trump,
Wiener,
WikiLeaks
Friday, October 28, 2016
Clinton Campaign Urgent News Release :: Immediate Logo Change Due to New FBI Investigation
First bit of honesty we've seen from them!
__________________________________________
Investor Alert:
Adult diaper stocks likely to increase drastically!
__________________________________________
Adult diaper stocks likely to increase drastically!
__________________________________________
Comey: FBI Re-Opens Clinton Email Investigation
How will Hillary explain this away? The media seems to be running from the flames ... others will follow because they (other than the really dumb ones) were never loyal to her, per se, they were loyal to the money and assumption of achieving some sort of power, Now they will be looking more like 'targets; for prosecution.
How will Hillary explain this away? The media seems to be running from the flames ... others will follow because they (other than the really dumb ones) were never loyal to her, per se, they were loyal to the money and assumption of achieving some sort of power, Now they will be looking more like 'targets; for prosecution.
The winds of change are blowing ... blowing hard ... and no, that's not a Bill Clinton joke even though it could work well as one!
The next few days are going to be really interesting ... someone is going to need an elephant gun to sedate Hillary and keep a safe distance from her!
Karma ...
Also see:
- A Clinton Christmas Carol
- Plain Fucking Nuts ... and Wants to be POTUS!
- Hillary only needs a few days in office before resigning
Labels:
Clinton,
corruption,
Election,
FBI,
fraud,
government,
laws,
Media,
politics,
whistle blower,
Wiener,
WikiLeaks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)