I'd be hacking too even though I'm not Russian!

Why would I hack (if I could!): Because political 'games' affect all of us and we know for sure that we DO NOT get full & factual information from the main stream media or from government SPOX.

Why would a foreign entity "hack"?: Same reason ... they would want to know the who, what, why and when, as much as they could, to prepare for the consequences of who will be guiding policy of a nation that may affect them. That's been going on for decades ... nothing new there.

The argument is screwed ... sorry ... meant "skewed": The point of contention here, when you listen to the arguments, is NOT that Russia was able to access servers ... it's about WHAT they revealed, if in fact Russia had anything to do with it at all!

There has been NO denial of the truth in the email exposures ...just angst about the METHOD ... and the method is being attacked, not the truth. Same "legal technicality"  bullshit that allows criminals to go free!

WikiLeaks has put out all the data, not the Russians: Without a shred of proof MSM taking heads espouse that WikiLeaks released data fed to them by Russian parties. WikiLeaks has denied this, and with WikiLeaks error-free track record over a decade I'd say their track record deserves far more credibility than talking heads, government "officials", anonymous sources or a president who have been caught out lying countless times.

Just like you and me: The Russians, or any other entity, want to know what they/we are up against or going to be helped by where political choices are concerned. That's called "being responsible" ... for yourself and your family, or for a nation you lead.

Hillary Clinton and the DNC lost the election: NOT because anyone tipped it by subversive means. They lost it because they do not have the trust of the electorate and with Obama's 'track record' mainstream Americans were scared shitless to trust another Democrat administration.

The "alternate media" is now the enemy, and being attacked in the so-called mainstream media: No surprise there ... liars hate being caught out and exposed. And a cooked, booked and hooked propaganda industry isn't about to give up their prestige and those awesome corporate adverting dollars just for the truth. (good reason to end corporate "person-hood" soon as possible.)

The Weird Hillary-Huma Correlations Exposed

 Truth is always stranger than fiction, they say. So in keeping with that I find it odd that Hillly and her pal Huma have some odd characteristics in common that make you say "What are the odds of that?"

1. Both are 'married' to sexual predators.
2. Both predators (deviants) are former politicians with troubled political pasts
3. Both women live rather 'estranged' lives from their 'spouses.'
4. Both women maintain 'living arrangements' with their deviant spouses ... whereas most women would not. So it's not out of the question that Hilly & Huma do so for expediency of some sort, putting that ahead of morality or outrage over spousal behaviors.
5. Both women were steeped, from young age, in philosophies that are very out-of-sync with traditional 'American values.' Hillary as a protege and admirer of the communist Saul Alinksky (Rules for Radicals), and Huma with her family's long (documented) association with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Just on those few points:

1. What sort of 'snapshot' do these things provide into the mindsets, morals, ethics and motivations of both women?
2. Does either woman appear to embody the essence of the 'typical' American family or values?
3. Could, therefore, either woman truly understand the true 'heart' of average Americans?
4. Hillary and Huma seem 'joined at the hip'. So if Hillary were to become President, you can bet Huma would be playing a significant role in her administration — after all, they do seem to have a very 'special' relationship and closeness.

In other words; They're a 'package deal' and will gather around them only those who support that package and will loyally do it's bidding.

Is that the sort of package you want under your tree this Christmas Season?

With responsibility comes 'obligations'.

With responsibility comes 'obligations'.

If our elected employees demand we surrender any and or all means of self defense; they are obliged to provide our guaranteed safety from any or all threats to personal safety 24/7.

Can they do so? The obvious answer is "no" ... they have no capacity to do so effectively. And, therefore, they have NO lawful basis to demand that we be defenseless against proven and heavily advertised threats to our safety!

"Dial 911" ... and get a response time of several minutes (at least.) AFTER the Q & A with the 911 operator ... great idea, bad solution ... the 'authorities' will show up in time to write a great report and take detailed pictures ... but you are still the victim and if you're lucky to still be breathing!

Scenario: You're being accosted by criminals ... you can't fight them because your elected employees have legislated you out of having a gun or even wearing body armor ... so you dial 911 and while waiting for the connection, you announce to your attackers that you're quite prepared to buy them a coffee while you wait for the police to arrive and even the odds so that things are "fair." That would work well ... right?? ... NOT!!

Governments and their employees owe their very existence to us ... and if they cannot do the job properly ... then we have every right to do so for ourselves ... particularly where the safety and defense of ourselves and families are concerned.

In other words ... 

NOBODY can 'lawfully' legislate any one of us

into victim-hood!