The Curious and Exceptional 'Trump Factor' being Investigated

Hold on here ... I have to understand this, and distill it down to the simplest of terms.

Details and minutiae are distracting from the core truths and that is what they are meant to do in a 'legal' environment ... you know, the same environment that lets a rapist walk on the basis of technicalities. Just ask Hillary about that and she'll be proud to tell you how she got one off ... the hook, that is.

James Comey, last year, gave a press conference at which he articulated numerous items of criminality/malfeasance regarding Hillary Clinton and her highly questionable email 'arrangements'.
He then gave her a 'pass' it was not his authority to give ... no charges or further investigation of the violations she clearly committed as he unambiguously itemized at the podium.
Fast forward ... June 2017

The same James Comey, before congress, admits there was never a 'criminal' (or otherwise) investigation into Donald Trump. And all testimony from intel agencies corroborates that there was no wrong-doing they could prove or identify.
Yet ... (amazingly)

A special prosecutor (Mueller) is appointed to investigate Trump ... rather than Hillary!

That being so because the fired FBI Director leaked information intentionally, through a third party, to the press, with the express intention fo forcing a special prosecutor to be appointed, according to his testimony.

Is it just me or is there a WEIRD, and illogical, disconnect in all of this?

And, if that were not enough ...

Comey and Mueller are old buddies and Mueller is assembling an "investigative" team comprised of Clinton allies! This is "objective" or "impartial"?? Credible results from a partisan committee?
Talk about 'politics' POSING as 'impartial inquiry'!

Trump has the authority to fire Mueller and thereby shut down the 'inquiry'.

Why hasn't he? Especially since the distractions are pulling time and attention away from his chief focus to re-energise and mobilize the US economy.

My theory is that Trump is completely confident that BECAUSE he has not done anything wrong, there is no way to prove he did so.

So why allow the charade to progress, even though he could end it with the stoke of a pen?

My theory (again) is that Trump, as he appears to be doing in other quarters, is allowing the miscreants to to haul in all the rope they want in order to hang themselves in the end.

Good plan ... how better to PROVE to the general public the BS they have bought into from the Dems and their media servants.

Rather than wasting more time publicly denying the political allegations, he seems quite happy to just move on with the things he can on his agenda and allow his opposition to humilate and disprove themselves ... which is clearly the pattern so far. More to come on that as the days ahead unfold.

Trump has a very high IQ and knows how to play "chess" ... although it must be a bit boring for him to go up against opponents like Pelosi (who can't seem to recall the current President's name), or Waters (who seems to think Russia invaded Korea) ... marble players trying to best a chess master. Well, the entertainment value is huge watching that play out!

My Prediction: Trump will do the best he can to weather the political flak/distraction to get his agenda in place for the sake of ALL Americans ... even those to are wrecking streets, businesses and neighborhoods in opposition to him. (Part time jobs paid for by George Sorass et al).

As Trump progresses along with his agenda he will prove how WRONG the past administrations have been ... and that is probably what panics the "left" most ... being exposed for the damage they have done and the lies they have propagated. No wonder they are promoting such violent resistance and mayhem. They are clearly frightened to face the retribution they are due as Americans of all colors and persuasions WAKE UP.

Virus-free. www.avg.com

Book of Revelations & The DNC & MSM

Disclaimer: I'm not a 'religious' man as such, especially having read the Bible — from cover to cover — and having made notes in my KJV using a Concordance as an important reference as I did so.

Therefore, I am an AGnostic ... which simply means "I don't know" the whole truth of history, and am unconvinced of many things.

However, I do not DIScount Biblical stories and testimonies, because the Bible provides a record of historical events, in a summarized form, and the lessons are quite clear ... because human behavior is largely the same now as it was then. "Sins" then are sins now ... same goes for virtues.

The Book of Revelations was particularly intriguing to me then, and even more so now as I watch history unfold each day.

In particular, I refer to what was said that in the 'end days' all knowledge would be revealed, and that appears to be the case more and more each day, largely thanks to the internet where information sharing cannot be controlled ... but tech algorithms in search engines seem designed to suppress that free sharing of thought among people as much as possible.

Do you see, as I do, that droves of people are supporting, sometimes violently, the very things that will eventually hurt them, their families and progeny? Why is that and where is it coming from?

The most obvious answer is that they are basing their actions and decisions on 'engineered  information', fed to them by the only venue most have conveniently available while they sup on Mac & Cheese that came out of a box and was quick & easy to prepare after a long day at work ... the Main Steam Media.

Personally, and I think the election of Trump substantiates this ... I think that the regular man or woman is a lot smarter than given credit for, because statistics show that reasonable people are tuning out from the ridiculous memes of the main stream media because they are sick of the taste of  engineered excrement that the MSM tries to spoon-feed the public through their TV sets!

The good and wholesome man or woman has in instinctual 'radar' that says ... "Not buying this".
That explains, I think, the triumph of Trump at the polls in November 2016 ... despite MSM rhetoric about Russians (or whatever else) to explain (justify) their bad calls about a "Hillary" victory ... which they 'presumed' to be a foregone result. And, remember too: EVERY example of voter fraud in the 2016 election FAVORED Hillary Clinton.

How else could they try to save face after being SO wrong? It's their corporate egos and corporate sponsorship money driving the agenda ... you are just "collateral damage" along the way.

Today's sad events  in Virginia and San Francisco really illustrate the point ... Why can't you protect yourself? Because it's politically incorrect? The MSM apparently thinks so and wants you to go along with that ... because THEY say so? Think again. You are expendable in the pursuit of a political agenda.

Stand up, speak up and protect what is good, wholesome and productive.

Explained: Why has Trump kept Swamp Members in the loop?

Trump is letting the traitors try, convict and hang themselves in full public view!
It's a beautiful thing to watch!

If Carpenters build houses like the left builds Trump cases

The Best Credit Card ... but you and I will never get one!

Hillary's Inconvenient Confession

No wonder the left is in a panic!

I'd be hacking too even though I'm not Russian!

Why would I hack (if I could!): Because political 'games' affect all of us and we know for sure that we DO NOT get full & factual information from the main stream media or from government SPOX.

Why would a foreign entity "hack"?: Same reason ... they would want to know the who, what, why and when, as much as they could, to prepare for the consequences of who will be guiding policy of a nation that may affect them. That's been going on for decades ... nothing new there.

The argument is screwed ... sorry ... meant "skewed": The point of contention here, when you listen to the arguments, is NOT that Russia was able to access servers ... it's about WHAT they revealed, if in fact Russia had anything to do with it at all!

There has been NO denial of the truth in the email exposures ...just angst about the METHOD ... and the method is being attacked, not the truth. Same "legal technicality"  bullshit that allows criminals to go free!

WikiLeaks has put out all the data, not the Russians: Without a shred of proof MSM taking heads espouse that WikiLeaks released data fed to them by Russian parties. WikiLeaks has denied this, and with WikiLeaks error-free track record over a decade I'd say their track record deserves far more credibility than talking heads, government "officials", anonymous sources or a president who have been caught out lying countless times.

Just like you and me: The Russians, or any other entity, want to know what they/we are up against or going to be helped by where political choices are concerned. That's called "being responsible" ... for yourself and your family, or for a nation you lead.

Hillary Clinton and the DNC lost the election: NOT because anyone tipped it by subversive means. They lost it because they do not have the trust of the electorate and with Obama's 'track record' mainstream Americans were scared shitless to trust another Democrat administration.

The "alternate media" is now the enemy, and being attacked in the so-called mainstream media: No surprise there ... liars hate being caught out and exposed. And a cooked, booked and hooked propaganda industry isn't about to give up their prestige and those awesome corporate adverting dollars just for the truth. (good reason to end corporate "person-hood" soon as possible.)

Laughable Hypocrisy — Mexico is upset about losing Ford plant & jobs — Blames Trump

Caution: This commentary will require an IQ of 100 at minimum. If you fall below that threshold you are advised to close your browser window now and return to Facebook or cartoons to maintain your comfort zone.

Moving on now with the 100+ crowd ...

Here is a quote from the AP article today (link below)

"Trump leaves Mexico without 3,600 jobs," read the headline on El Universal. "Ford's braking jolts the peso," said Reforma, referring to the Mexican currency's nearly 1 percent slump following the news.

I really can't remember when Mexico ever objected to Americans losing jobs when plants moved there!

Sort of hypocritical, huh! ... Blaming Trump because Mexico has an externally-dependent and dysfunctional economy! Ohhh ... that sure stacks up on common sense & logic!

And!! If 3,600 jobs can affect the peso by 1% ... what the hell kind of economy does Mexico have? Not one that isn't dependent on outside help ... and Mexico, on top of it, is one of the richest nations on earth with all their natural resources!

Maybe ... just a thought here ... if Mexico ORIGINATED anything worth manufacturing (other than great tequila and a prolific drug trade, mind you) they would not have to rely on foreign businesses to create jobs for their people ... and the peso wouldn't slump 1% because ONE factory changes it's plans!

I know ... it's a "weird concept" ... but I'm sticking with it!

I am also laughing my shiny ass off because the hypocrisy is so evident ... but also worried as hell too because so many Americans (Members of A.N.U.S. — Americans Not Understanding Sovereignty) actually support this shit!

Of course, it must be said that those pathetic people in A.N.U.S. take their 'marching orders' from SPHinCTER (Soros' Political Hegemony in Contradiction To Everything Republican) and blindly blather on while they protest, burn cars, loot local businesses and harm people physically to express their frustrations.

(Therefore the A.N.U.S. retentive people are SPHinCTER dependent which creates P.I.L.E.S. ... Problematic Idiocy Leading to Economic Suffering) ... just so you know.

Apparently the notion of "America First" is offensive to those who insist "Mexico First", and those A.N.U.S. members might want to move to Mexico to lend their expertise to the Mexican government about getting their own economy functioning, on-track and viable.

Reference: AP — http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/L/LT_MEXICO_FORD?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2017-01-04-14-45-38

2017 — The Year to Stop the Insanity

Happy New Year one and all ... if only there was some guarantee of that being true.

2016 has ended with a lot of Hope ... because there has been such Change in the awareness of average people across the globe ... people (not persons) have, en mas, awoken to how badly they have been screwed over by the political and financial classes, and those who have bought and paid for them for far too long.

2016 has ended, specifically since early November, as an expose of the vile power politics and corruption that have undermined the lives of the middle class particularly, and the country generally.

2017 starts tomorrow ... what do we have to look forward to?

Not World War III ... Putin isn't rising to the inflammatory bait from a petulant Obama ... he's 'biting the bullet' till Trump is inaugurated on the 20th when artificially created tensions can be put aside for everyone's sake.

A path back to prosperity ... for individual working people, as well as the companies that create the jobs for them.

>> Trump is delivering on election promises before being sworn in ... already bringing jobs back and setting the table for renegotiation of destructive agreements that have robbed us all. Plus tax policies that make America a good place to set up shop again.

Common sense ... instead of political correctness and all the confusion it creates because people (not persons) will be able to communicate effectively between themselves again.

Hope (the real kind) ... that is already happening because people (not persons) sense that the tide has changed for the better ... that there is a new Captain coming aboard who actually knows how to navigate difficult waters, and who actually cares about the safety and welfare (well-being) of those who have elected to trust his hand on the ship's wheel through the storms and waves ahead.

Change (the real kind) ... the 'old guard' who have undermined and diminished the country are being identified and side-lined to where they can do no further damage. Obama's actions of late demonstrate how desperate they are to prevent that change ... even risking and provoking war with Russia to do so. Fortunately Putin sees their game plan and isn't playing along.

A Reset (not a cheesy dollar store novelty button) ... people (not persons) across our globe are fed up with the messes created by the political and financial elites and are speaking up, putting their foot(s) down and saying, in unison, "Enough of this crap!"

The ants have finally figured out the shit the grasshoppers have burdened them with ... 2017 holds enormous promise ... stay the course.

Russian Hacking: Obama is attempting to suicide the nation before Jan 20th

Democrats (and their media servants) blame Russia for “hacking” and tipping the election to Trump.

What did or could Russia “hack”? The only “hacks” could have been in large centers where machines are used … if those machines were online during the voting process … which they are not until transmitting results.

Maybe the work “hack” is/was inaccurate … no surprise there considering the source(s) of that accusation.

So far no actual proof has been offered … just speculations based on anonymous sources. That sure wouldn't hold up in a court room and certainly wouldn't be grounds for a warrant request.

Whether Russians did or did not “hack” anything … not that it's possible to any extent: The objections we are hearing are about what was being exposed are factual happenings voters SHOULD know to make an informed decision

The objections are not about the content ... just about the method ... same technical crap that let’s criminals go free in courtrooms every day.

The difference is that revelations about the Democrats, Hillary, the DNC etc are actual information for voters to see past the speeches and into the hearts/minds of those making them. That is very relevant information … especially when choosing a President who will affect your life significantly for at least four years.

Elections are just ‘job interviews’ … in front of the millions of people (not persons) who are the collective ‘employer’. And let's be clear that people DO NOT vote for those 'job applicants' behind podiums to be their 'masters' … nor do they vote for 'social engineers'. They vote for someone who will represent them as they want to be represented … nothing less.

Last time you applied for a job you had to provide your work history and credible references, and those were subject to investigation and confirmation before hiring. (Scrutiny)

Can anyone tell me how hiring a politician differs from that basic fact everyone else must live by?

So if, in that job interview process, information comes to light, regardless of the source, that exposes facts relevant to the legitimacy, capability or intent of the 'job applicant', and that information is accurate, regardless of source; Why should that not be a viable basis upon which the electorate (employers) make a decision as to who to choose for that job?

The 'losers' of the November 8th job interview are trying to blame Russia … Comey … right wingers … anyone other than themselves for the truths that were exposed about their means, tactics, methods and collusions … they got caught, red-handed and are pissed because they

So pissed that the outgoing Representative of the Democrat ideology is initiating actions that could promote international hostilities … possibly to claim there is an “emergency” that requires him to stay in office, thereby preventing a Trump transition on January 20th.

Stay tuned and stay aware … anything is possible before January 20th. That's when the power struggle ends and the healing can begin.

Obama claims 3rd Presidential run victory ... but only against Hillary

Obama Says He Would Have Defeated Trump for a Third Term ... in an interview with David Axelrod, who we all know is an impartial and objective journalist!

Sorry, Barry ... your hubris does not match with facts.

Against Hillary you would have won hands down ... she has no worthy track record and an over-sized ego. You, on the other hand have no worthy track record and an over-sized ego. So you would have won just because you're there already ... not because you're competent or great in any way.

Hillary lost on the basis of her own dis-merits combined with your 'track record' of making America weaker in every important aspect.

Hope & Change? Who's hope and what change were you actually referring to?

Could you have won against Donald Trump?

Not likely ... outside of highly dense populated areas (i.e. New York and California where the bulk of your welfare-dependent supporters dwell) Donald Trump won the majority of counties across America, which represent a broad spectrum of Americans, their lives and their means of sustenance ... they voted en masse for him which is far more representative than inner-city enclaves of government-dependent voters ... not to mention that those inner city areas are also the areas most vulnerable to vote fraud via machines, illegal immigrants (who you support so much) and tampering.

Could you have won against Trump? Yes you say?? Ok ... now you're the "dreamer". Let's look at a few FACTS, even though you find facts unpleasant, annoying and uncomfortable.

Trump talks to people, unscripted and from the heart ... you talk at people via a teleprompter, reading words written by someone else.

Trump is his own, accomplished, man with undeniable credentials in the press and as an expert witness before congress over decades ... you are a nobody with no substantial accomplishments and you had to seal your records to make sure nobody could vet your claims to 'greatness' & merits.

Trump, following the foregoing, has done more in the month and a half since the election to straighten out America's many tense situations than you were able to do in eight years with your famous pen and phone. No surprise there since Trump's track record is based on being in the office WORKING ... as opposed your plan of being on a golf course and excusing yourself for NOT working.

Trump's reputation (something you do not possess outside of a phony Peace Prize) has caused international business and political leaders to come to the table to renegotiate on Trump's  terms for the betterment of America ... as opposed to you, giving the store away from a golf course with your pen and phone, as you put it.

Trump, pre-inauguration, has brought jobs and companies back to America ... apparently he does have a "magic wand" as you mentioned ... or, perhaps, he supports America in a manner you apparently don't or cannot fathom.

Trump is, pre-inauguration, the President of America in the eyes of the world ... because you have been so inept, transparently shallow (yup ... there's that transparency you mentioned) and completely dishonest that the world is laughing at you.

Here is your legacy Barry Barack Husein Marshall Obama Soetero Harrison Davis (or whatever the hell your actual name is) ... there will be more people saying "good riddance" than will be saying "good bye" come the 20th of January, 2017.

Hillary's Ego Defeats Her Again ... eventually she might learn somthing?

 

OK ... hate to say it ... actually I love to say it!

I told you so!!

Yesterday's post predicted this

Hillary LOST electoral votes!

Hillary's cheap efforts and 3rd party antics have again proven that lies and deceit (however "clever" you might feel you are at the time) blow up in your face... "blow-back" as Ron Paul famously said. Gotta love Karma seeing this happen!

Hillary really seems to work in a sort of 'lawyer mode' ... if you can "win" with (parsed) words, and procedural tricks ... truth, facts, honesty, morality, decency, respect (all the good aspects of humanity) don't count.

Sorry (not) to bring this to your attention, Hillary and associated minions, ... the united states of America is not your 'court room' where you can play procedural and word games. It is, in fact, a collection of real people, with real lives ... people who care about a future that benefits their children and stands in honor as the most compassionate and generous nation on earth.

You, Hillary, thought you could STEAL this election with your tricky methods ... like you stole the nomination from Bernie Sanders. You misjudged ... your loyal miscreants misjudged too ... or, they were petrified to tell you the truth because truth isn't something germane to your character ... apparently you violently oppose it!

You lost the election on November 8th ... now you lost it even worse because you're the worst candidate in the history of politics in the united states of America ... but your ego didn't coincide with the condemnations you made about Trump when he refused to pre-commit acceptance of the results. Why would he with your history of deceit?

So you have humiliated yourself further ... even though you want to blame every and anyone other than yourself for your self-inflicted loss.

People don't trust you ... why the hell should they? People don't like you ... why the hell would they?

Go away with your family and minions ... stay away and don't inflict yourself and ideas on good people any further. Good bye Hillary ... or, better, good riddance for everyone's sake here and abroad.

Electors — Mind your ass and reputation on the 19th

Significant history is being made with the 2016 Presidential election. Those associated with this election will certainly have a place in the history books.

What side of history will those people be on when the books are written? What will children learn about them in social studies classes in the future? Whatever they learn will be based on the actions of those written about. And they will judge based on the world they are living in ... good or bad.

The Electoral College, this year, is particularly in the spotlight because unproved allegations of Russian interference are being propagated by people with a vested interest in changing the election results.

So far, the suspiciously funded efforts of Jill Stein have yielded only additional Trump votes ... so Hillary now lost by bigger numbers! No wonder she's apparently drinking more than usual!

So I had a funny thought about the allegations of  "Russian influence" ... the chance of them having done so is minuscule ... however IF they had the means to do so, to benefit Trump, it introduced a question I've not heard mentioned at all throughout all the media coverage!

IF Russia favored Trump, and had any means to significantly affect election results' Why would they do so?

Clearly Trump is too patriotic for the answer to be Russia having a cooperative 'puppet' as POTUS.

So it must be somethings else!

Perhaps (as radical as this may sound) ... IF Russia were to have made efforts to influence the election; Is it therefore reasonable to think that their reason may have been to deal with a President who wants peace and commerce as a relationship (Trump)?

After all, Hillary Clinton has maintained a distinctive posture of aggression toward Russia ... vilifying them (Putin) for all her problems ... so WHO would Russia rather deal with? Someone advocating peace & commerce ... or someone who wants a fight and blames them for her political failure?

So, if you were Russian: Who would you favor? That's NOT a difficult question if you are sane!!

Technically, Russia could not have affected the election in a "hacking' sense to any significant level, if at all ... no proof has been or could be provided to establish they did ... but the sound bytes continue because (according to some) Hillary's electoral humiliation on Oct 8th simply MUST be someone else's fault!

So with the failure of Jill Stein's conveniently funded recount efforts (more money collected than she got for her Presidential run!) ... now the Electors are in the spotlight ... under documented pressure, harassment and threats of physical harm to become 'faithless' and switch their votes from Trump to Clinton. Does that sound reasonable? Would any witness in a court have credibility when there is credible evidence they were coerced or intimidated?

Seems to me that any significant switch in the Electoral College vote should be suspect, And any Elector switching his or her vote faces the judgement of history ... and of those who voted faithfully and entrusted their vote to that elector.

The Electors ... lets hope they have sense in the face of fear and intimidation and partisan spin.

Obama thought he could see the future — got punked instead

The Trump Dilemma :: Let's sort things out with logic — instead of political hyperbole.

The election 'contest' isn't over
— it's devolved into a proxy war — so let us consider a few things before hyperventilating.

The Electoral College

Faithless Electors:

adjective

1. not adhering to allegiance, promises, vows, or duty: the faithless behavior of Benedict Arnold.

2. not trustworthy; unreliable.

3. without trust or belief.

4. being without religious faith.

5. (among Christians) bereft of Christian faith.

So if some turn their votes over, regardless of the excuse or “justification”, they will be Pariahs in their own communities. They will have ignored the will of their peers and will deserve the inevitably backlash they will get. It will suck to be them walking down the street afterward.

Plenty of publicity is now focusing on the harassment and threats they are receiving since their names we published. That creates another problem because coercion/extortion are, in any court, reason to discount the testimony of a witness ... and electors are simply that ... witnesses ... not judges or arbiters ... just witnesses to the vote of their peers. Have you ever heard of the names of a jury being posted publicly? Of course not ... that would undermine and presumption of impartiality and would open those jurors to coercion. The electors are no different.

Recounts and Audits

Jill Stein is getting a lot of attention for her novel challenge of the vote counts in states where Trump won ... states where the Electoral College numbers could turn the tables. Problem is that now there have been weeks to play with results. For instance, those amazing new votes for Clinton that were just descovered! In fact the audit results thus far seem to increase Trump's lead and margin!

Stein has no standing as an 'Aggressive' party ... she wasn't even on the radar as a potential winner. Yet and without the support of her own party, she presses on to muddy the process. Why? WHAT incentive could be driving her? Her political career is now over ... what would / could motivate anyone to give up their political standing and ambitions to that degree? If you have room-temperature IQ, you'll figure that out quite quickly!

Spin versus Fact

Listened to a presentation today by someone who really tried hard to sound 'objective'. A couple minutes into his presentation I found myself amazed that he was bereft of facts. I thought I may be listening to something recorded last spring ... before a lot of facts became evident. I was also gob-smacked that the individual narrating the video could not have heard anything Trump has actually said and furthermore is completely ignorant of the positive changes happening daily because Trump is now President-elect!

What has he missed?

Little & apparently unimportant things such as?;

• Ford keeping jobs in the USA
• Carrier keeping jobs in the USA
• Apple moving operations back from China
• International war tensions dropping significantly
• Dollar is strong
• Stock markets are up
• Canada and Mexico voluntarily stepping up to renegotiate NAFTA
• ...just to mention a few

Basically ... optimism is way up, and that is just on the basis of Trump being President-elect .... not the actual President! 

Violent versus Calm

Who are the violent people? Not Trump supporters ... they are the calm ones. Who are burning, looting and pillaging communities? Not Trump supporters ... they are the calm ones. Who are burning American flags? Not Trump supporters ... they are the calm ones who love and support the flag.

Are you getting it yet? The violent upsetters of your every-day life are those who are paid to disrupt it. Who paid for these buses that brought all the violence to your streets? Guaranteed it wasn't Trump supporters. So who does that leave, who has a motive & agenda?

You'll figure that one out too! ... for your own sake hopefully! 

Why would anyone want to be President of the USA? 

Is that the $64 M question?

Nope ... I think its the 50 cent answer.

• Ego: No doubt that is part of it. But wait a sec ... if your ego is on the line ... do you want or plan to fail? So what if you are already a success in business and life? Do you set out to fail and disappoint & fail as a 'crowning achievement'? Me thinks not.
  
  Financial success: The president's salary isn't a windfall, so that can't be it ... if you're a minor-leager it may seem so ... but if you're a self-made billionaire, financing your own campaign, likely not.
  
• Power: Well there's an inducement for sure. However, if you have the financial resources to buy/sell politicians ... what more 'power' do you need?
  
• Love of Country: This one actually makes sense ... it's the only one that can possibly explain why a successful, influential billionaire would put up with / endure / tolerate the political and media bullshit Trump has, rather than just retire quietly, at 70 years old, to one of his wonderful clubs around the wold and play golf, and let his awesome children run the amazing business he has built.

Conclusion

We have all been outraged at times having heard about a guilty party being exonerated and let free on a 'legal technicality'.

How would you feel, then, about a life-long criminal taking control of your country, and therefore of your life, by playing the technicality game?

Encourage your electors to keep the faith and stay the course unless you want your country to die and be swallowed up by foreign usurpers and their traitorous minions.

I'm going to commit a "hate crime" — against a hateful 'human' — and proud of it!

Spread this meme far and wide!

Is it a "crime" to hate something or someone?

I say you can hate anything or anyone you want.

Any "crime" associated with that "hate" is only about what you DO ... not what you think or express honestly. Thoughts are just thoughts ... it's ACTIONS that may be "crimes."

So look above at that meme ...

Do I "hate" George Soros?

Yes! ... I hate what he does (actions) and the effects he has on innocent people through his political and social engineering ambitions. Actually it goes beyond "hate" ... he is in the "disgust" category!

I wrote an article about him you should read before proceeding further here, unless you already know his sordid history. Watch the videos ... he actually admits to his actions and has no regrets. Why would he? He's a billionaire now and the neighbors he sold out to the Nazis in WWII are DEAD.

Soros has money, lots of it ... so he thinks of himself as part of an 'elite nobility' who have some 'right' to guide we, the lesser ones. He actually thinks he has 'honor' and therefore 'privilege' to decide for others!

I take this VERY personally ... let me tell you why and you'll know why I have such hate for this "man" ... although it pains me to use that word in reference to him.

My Grandfather was a police chief ... in Greater Copenhagen during World War II. He was sent to a Nazi concentration camp because he stood for his principles and refused Gestapo demands to order his constabulary to assist in the roundup of Danish Jews ... ultimately who would be sent to concentration camps. We all know what happened to them there.

My Father, in his teens, joined the Danish underground, and as a boy, really, worked to smuggle Danish Jews out of Denmark to neutral Sweden, He was captured and interrogated by the Gestapo at times but survived those inquisitions.

Two men of high honor ... two men who have established for me what it is to have honor and be honorable.

So when I look at a weak, self-serving, opportunistic parasite like George Soros; How could my disgust and 'hate' be a crime of any sort?

Decent people buried in ditches were the foundation of his current wealth ... please tell me how that could in anyway give him credibility to speak for anyone at all ... let alone influence how others will lead their lives!

Ohhh ... by the way ... Soros is a prime patron and funder of Hillary Clinton ... and, by extension, perhaps the reason Jill Stein has raised such amazing money in such record time to play the election challenge game. She is a bought-off piece of shit too if that is the case!

Do the research ... Soros is the funder of all those paid thugs burning cars in your streets ... he has an agenda and you are not part of it. Learn about this asshole and all the political and media pies he has his dirty fingers in ... then get angry about how he proposes to fuck up your life with his money and connections.

Spread this article and meme ... in the (paraphrased) words of John Lennon ... "All we are asking, is give Trump a chance."

I think Trump deserves at least that ... he has already accomplished much in two weeks as 'President-Elect' ... think how much more he will do from the Oval Office!

EXPOSE this criminal bastard, George Soros, in every way you can ... evil cannot live or survive in the light.

Thanksgiving Should Include America's Second Chance — Not Just celebrate a Comfy Delusion of Days Gone By

What is everyone so thankful for this weekend?

Prosperity? — Where?? (outside of Wall Street & DC, of course)

Health? — GMOs, Chemtrails and ObamaCare equal "health"?

Safety? — Russia, N. Korea, ISIS and paid gangs running wild in the streets?

Thankful for those maybe?

Prosperity: Who feels that way right now? At least 90 million under and unemployed Americans don't! Middle America perhaps? ... nope — Inner city folks then? Who?

Health: How much does it cost you? Did you keep your Doctor or plan? Does the FDA look out for you, or for big Pharma & big Agra instead? Do you give your thanks for being sprayed like a bug by unaccountable people?

Safety: The Russians hack elections! ... North Korea could detonate an EMP! ... ISIS is planning events to kill Americans over the holiday! But you're a 'terrorist' and 'hater' and 'racist' if you disagree with leaving the borders wide-open for those and other threats to just walk on in! Yup ... but give thanks anyway because it's 'traditional' to do so!

How many homeless and destitute Veterans are giving thanks this weekend, having honorably served in the name of and for the nation as they sleep under sheets of cardboard on the side of a street with nothing to eat?

Probably most of them ... because they would never have signed up to put themselves in harm's way for a country they didn't love and believe in ... who would?

Compare them to the masked vandals on the streets. After the "protest" they go home, toke up and discuss how successful they think they were bringing down the very county that affords them the opportunity to legally be such unappreciative, destructive and disrespectful morons. The hard-working people whose property they destroyed in the process might have a different opinion!

In fact ... they did!

On November 8th, 2016, 'productive Americans' drew a line in the sand and decisively elected a President who squarely put Americans ahead of corporations, politics and politicians.

Yikes!!! No wonder there are protests! What a weird thing to do! What a strange concept that the lives and well-being of American citizens should take priority over the profits of corporations and the ideas of the politicians who created the problems in the first place! Quick, go out and protest that ... in fact if you check Craigslist you can actually get paid to do so ... and transported to the protest in a nice bus!

You can criticize Trump for any number of things from his choice of words to his choice of barber ... but you can't legitimately criticize his passion for the country and making it great again. He wants America to have a second change to be what it was, and more.

Trump ACTUALLY DID what an old and true adage says ... He put HIS money where His mouth is, and did so in a no-nonsense manner that won the popular and electoral vote against an opponent who put other people's money (about 4 to 1) where her mouth was on any given day.

In other words, Trump invested personally in you and the future of the country.

So give thanks this weekend that the majority of America woke up and said "no" to being dragged down any further, and said "yes" to rebuilding a great nation that went astray for a while.

Hillary Clinton 'Nervous Breakdown' With No Options Left Now But to Run

Click to enlarge meme

The 'Trump Train' is in the station

— Good people are boarding & the Rats are scurrying or kissing ass

If Trump's Attorney General (Jeff Sessions) decides to pursue charges against Hillary Clinton; It's not mysogynism, vengeance or hate on Trump's part ... it's because there is sufficient prima facie evidence (at very least) that Hillary is culpable ... on many fronts. Anyone paying the LEAST attention to facts knows this.

Trump is successful, in part, because he chooses his people well and delegates to them — any successful person will confirm this as the way to do things properly.

If you haven't seen Hillary's post election speech the other day, the first since losing the election, you should.

And when you do, think of this: Hillary's ego is virtually 'legendary' ... as is her vanity. Throughout the debates and the general election, who knows how much money was spent to make her up to look healthy and vibrant (her health being a subject of much credible debate.)

Yet she chose (or allowed herself) — doesn't really mater which as they are the same — to appear on stage, before an audience and on-camera, looking haggard, frail and weak and sounding so as well.

 

Why would that be? Well, I have a theory ... and since it's mine I respect it a lot!

My theory goes like this:

Hillary Clinton never expected to lose the election. She did expect that she had it all 'locked up' because all the "chips" were in her favor ... machines flipping Trump votes to her, machines shaving votes to her favor, dead citizens voting for her (by proxy of course), busloads of 'undocumented Americans' (illegals) voting for her (multiple times each), the mainstream media colluding with her including feeding her advance debate questions, Beyonce & JayZ (who graciously accepted a $63 million dollar paycheck for showing up to 'support' her & 'root' for her on stage) ... the list goes on (talk about "buying the Presidency.") The famous "Clinton Machine" was hard at work for her.

What Hillary did NOT expect is that the average, wholesome, hard-working, bill-paying American (a term it's doubtful she actually understands) would wake up, stand up and vote for a man who is a total DC outsider ... a man who is of plain language (rather than contrived rhetoric written third party for a teleprompter), who actually has 'family values' and kids who work hard and make their own successes in the world, who (out of passion and commitment, financed his own campaign — no Wall Street, Saudi, Qatari et al money there), and who showed Americans he was passionate about THEIR well-being.

It resonated, because any American actually listening heard the TRUTH being spoken, as uncomfortable as that would have often been!

That kind of plain talk created TRUST ... and regardless of CNN/ABC/MSNBC and all the other 'in-the-bag-for-Hillary' media efforts ... all the tricks, hyperbole and disinformation still resulted in an landslide ENDORSEMENT of Donald J. Trump (popular and electoral) to lead America back to her deserved prosperity.

Obviously, after making such assumptions that she would prevail, Hillary was devastated in her defeat. Not just the loss itself, also the loss of "future options" she simply must have expected to be hers!

For example;

• Being able (as President) to seal - under signature as Obama did - her and Bill's past records
• Pardoning or diverting (as President) investigations into her closest circle of friends who got her back into the White House ... as President!
• Putting Bill out on the speaking stage for highly increased speaking fees and no doubt more.

So, back on point, why would Hillary show up on stage and on-camera looking so disheveled?

Answer: PITY ... for two reasons;

• 'Egg on' all those idiots protesting who can't seem to fathom that Hillary lost the election on her own because of her past malfeasance and disingenuous persona,

Those ignorant 'chumps' protesting Trump have no cognizance of what they are supporting or fighting! Just listen to a video or two of real interviews with them ... they are totally disconnected from reality and even from the words and terms they use so 'confidently.' ... they seem to be on a totally different planet!

• To set up the 'stage' that if prosecuted it could be characterized as a "vicious", "anti-woman", "anti-poor-frail-Hillary", "nasty Republican witch hunt."

Well the "witch" (could be spelled with a 'B' as well!) part is certainly true and there are legions of Secret Service and Military personnel who'd corroborate that ... if they could keep their jobs after having done so!

But the Clintons still have an 'ass in the hole' ... skip out of the country with all those lovely 'excess' dollars in the Clinton Foundation accounts ... lots.

Meanwhile, back on the political farm ... all those starry-eyed followers who committed a trove of criminal acts to 'help' Hillary achieve her 'deserved' destiny of being the first female (sorry, can't think of her as a woman) President will face the repercussions ... while Hillary drinks herself silly in Qatar (no extradition) and Bill entertains himself with Jeff Epstein on the Lolita Express and on Orgy Island till he keels over.

Oh ya ... there's going to be a lot of 'Hillary-splaining' going on as the rats scurry for whatever legal hole they think they can hide in. With any luck, the reign of the Progressives is over and rumors about George Soros exiting this world with a heart attack are true ... which I doubt because someone like him is completely unlikely to have a heart to begin with ... but one can still hope Karma finally caught up with him!

"PC" — The Post-Constitutional Progressive Language Distortion Project — Video Included

 

"Come, let Us go down and there confuse their language, so that they will not understand one another's speech."— Genesis 11:7

That was probably the origin of the maxim: "Divide and conquer" ... because it apparently worked! And it has been proven to work very well throughout most of human history since.

Nowadays it has a new name — "Political Correctness" (PC for short). Let's take a little look and see what possible sense this term makes!

Just for fun, to start with, here is author Chet Beates' very poignant definition of what it means:

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of shit by the clean end."

It's not political ... it's socially driven on a political agenda from behind the scenes. And, it's not correct either ... nothing so disruptive and destructive could possibly be 'correct'.

Another term for "Political Correctness" could easily be "Social Censorship." That would be tolerable if you could just tell whoever it is to "piss off" and be done with their nonsense ... unfortunately vote-desperate politicians have now codified a lot of it into laws that are diametrically opposed to the 1st amendment — that's where it gets dangerous for a healthy society.

What other terms could we come up with to more accurately describe what "PC" really means?

• Perceptually Clouded speech
• Politically Controlled speech
• Partially Clear speech
• Post-Constitutional speech (let that one sink in for a minute!)
• Politically Cucked speech
• Perpetually Confused speech
• Permanently Castrated speech
• Progressive Codswallop speech
• Passive Communication speech
• Prevaricated Crap speech
• Preempted Clarity speech
• Pesky Cretin speech
• Pinko Collusion speech
• Pander and Cringe speech
• Poppy Cuck speech
•  ... hey, I could have fun with this all day ... but I digress.

The ancient Chinese also knew the folly of PC type speech. There is an old saying there that goes as follows: "The beginning of wisdom is to call a thing by it's correct name."

But, the PC crowd is fearful that some expressions could 'offend' someone! Comedian Steve Hughes discusses just this point in the little clip below (For you sensitive types, his language is "colorful.")

It gets dangerous when and angry mob can call for killing cops (and consider doing so their constitutionally protected freedom of speech) and yet politicians and cops are frozen to act for fear of being called "racist" or some other such PC label.

The left (Progressive PC crowd) will throw around all kinds of offensive slurs ... racist, homophobe, xenophobe, ad nauseam and never get called on either the accuracy or "hurtfulness" of their words in the media. But if someone else refers to someone who just shot up a nightclub while screaming Aluha Akbar as an "Islamic Terrorist" the same crowd will wet themselves over the use of such a cogent and accurate description based on the actual event and facts.

The words double-standard, hypocritical, illogical and demented come firmly to mind.

Needless to say we all (we who are sane, that is) need to pay more attention to these almost daily examples of PC stupidity and obfuscation and focus attention on these clowns ... start making THEM afraid to open THEIR mouths for fear of being exposed for their utterly senseless drivel. 

Laugh at them wherever and whenever you can ... point at them too!

They have had a buddy in the White House almost egging them on for quite a while, supporting these dangerous cognitive inversions. Fortunately that time has now ended. 

Foot Note1 : Left unchecked this bunch will be protesting to have Manhattan renamed Personhattan because it's "sexist"!

Foot Note 2 : Some feedback has suggested that my warning about Steve's language should have been more "specific" since "colorful" isn't "descriptive" enough. It was a tough choice between;

• "Off-Color" ... would have been deemed racist for sure
• "Adult" ... discriminates against people due to age?
• "Vulgar" ... discriminatory against Hillary's staff management style!
• "Offensive" ... would have triggered those who protect 'artistic expression'
• "Strong Language" ... would offend those who deem 'strength' as oppressive
• "Straight Forward" ... a possible "homophobic" outing of LBGTQ readers ... if I have any
• "Cussing" ... definitely get accused of being a deplorable redneck!

... Piss off ... I'll stick with "colorful'. 

Trump Cabinet & Staff Choices Controversies ... don't fear the hype ... trust the logic

With the election over, and soundly won (popular and college) ... the previous hyperventilating about Donald Trump as a President is useless ... so, hyperventilating about his potential staff, cabinet and other appointments is the new topic of the "let's panic and revolt" crowd ... the propaganda crowd who are humiliated by their past bloviating and 'expert opining' are desperate to somehow justify/excuse themselves so to remain relevant. (Good luck with that at this point!!)

If you know anything at all about Donald Trump's history, you'd know he has a history of defying the odds ... and winning. His Father told him that while they were successful in Brooklyn, Manhattan was somewhere they shouldn't try to go. But Trump did, and against all odds succeeded ... against some of the toughest competitors in the world.

Because he got things done successfully ... on time and under budget! That's how you succeed!

Compare that to how he dispatched all 16 'politically entrenched' competitors in the primaries (pretty good for an non-politician "novice") ... and then 'dispatched' the invincible Hillary Clinton (an entrenched DC denizen with Wall Street and other actors funding her) ... and won the general election with phenomenal success using only his own money ... not donor money.

These are not the 'accomplishments' of a "clown", or a "reality show host" ... they ARE the accomplishments of someone with experience and knowledge in tough situations who knows tactics and who is driven by honest passion. No wonder his book 'The Art of The Deal' has been such a long-standing success. (All the profits from those book sales go to charity, by the way.)

He may bring some people into his circle who are 'establishment' regulars ... but a man of his accomplishments will be doing so with some intent ... to learn from them about the political landscape as it really is. That's not naive or stupid ... that's very smart.

After all, a good tactician abides by the following mantra:

"Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer." This quote has often been attributed to Sun Tzu and sometimes to Niccolò Machiavelli or Petrarch. It matters not who said it ... it matters that it is a fact-based reality.

As President-Elect, just a week after the election and without any 'power as President' the following has already occurred in accordance with his positions as stated throughout both the primaries and the general;

1. The US dollar is trading up ... indicating market confidence
2. The stock markets have rallied up ... indicating investor confidence in the future
3. Tensions with Russia are down ... indicating there is a reduction of defensiveness
4. Canada and Mexico have offered to renegotiate NAFTA ... indicating both know about the imbalances Trump spoke of.
5. Ford has moved a truck production plant from Mexico to Ohio ... indicating they know Trump will be good to his word on sanctions.
6. Apple is talking about moving production to California from China

Trump isn't even President yet and look what he's done ... already delivering on his campaign promises! What the hell are those idiots in the streets actually protesting? ... ah, perhaps they are worried that if he brings all those jobs back, they'd have no excuse not to go get one and move out of Mom & Dad's basement!

Obama espoused "hope & change" ... which turned into 'hope for change' ... which resulted in Donald Trump winning the election by a landslide since that "hope" didn't pan out and the "change" was for the worse.

Trump has already done more good for America, in only 7 days as 'President-Elect', than Obama did in almost eight years as President ... not that Obama actually DID anything that has actually benefited Americans in general!

Refute that ... if you can!


***************************************